Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Branagan v. Neven, 2:15-cv-01575-GMN-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160224d03 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On August 17, 2015, the petitioner, Thomas Branagan, submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1). On August 19, 2015, finding Branagan able to pay the filing fee, the court denied his application to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered him to pay the filing fee within 30 days. The court stated that failure to comply with that order would result in the dismissal
More

ORDER

This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On August 17, 2015, the petitioner, Thomas Branagan, submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1).

On August 19, 2015, finding Branagan able to pay the filing fee, the court denied his application to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered him to pay the filing fee within 30 days. The court stated that failure to comply with that order would result in the dismissal of this action. Branagan did not pay the filing fee in the time allowed. Therefore, on September 30, 2015, the court dismissed this action, and judgment was entered accordingly (ECF No. 4, 5)

On October 22, 2015, Branagan filed what the court construed to be a motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (ECF No. 6). In that motion, Branagan stated that he attempted to pay the filing fee, but was unable to do so, and he requested additional time to pay the filing fee. On November 2, 2015, the court granted Branagan's motion, and ordered the judgment vacated (ECF No. 7). The court granted Branagan more than two more months — to January 8, 2016 — to pay the filing fee. The court stated that if he was no longer able to pay the filing fee, Branagan could file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court warned that failure to comply with that order, within the time allowed, would result in dismissal of this action.

Branagan did not, by January 8, 2016, pay the filing fee or file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. In fact, since the November 2, 2015 order, Branagan has taken no further action at all with respect to this case. Therefore, the case will be dismissed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer