Filed: Apr. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF, CRUSHER DESIGNS, LLC, TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Crusher Designs, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "Crusher Designs"), on the one hand, and Defendants Atlas Copco U.S.A. Holdings, Inc. and Mining, Rock Excavation and Construction, LLC (together, the "Defendants"), on the other hand, state the following: 1. On March 20, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF, CRUSHER DESIGNS, LLC, TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Crusher Designs, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "Crusher Designs"), on the one hand, and Defendants Atlas Copco U.S.A. Holdings, Inc. and Mining, Rock Excavation and Construction, LLC (together, the "Defendants"), on the other hand, state the following: 1. On March 20, 2014,..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF, CRUSHER DESIGNS, LLC, TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
(FIRST REQUEST)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Crusher Designs, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "Crusher Designs"), on the one hand, and Defendants Atlas Copco U.S.A. Holdings, Inc. and Mining, Rock Excavation and Construction, LLC (together, the "Defendants"), on the other hand, state the following:
1. On March 20, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on a Motion to Dismiss.
2. Plaintiff was served with the Motion via the Court's CM/ECF system on March 20, 2015.
3. Due to unavoidable circumstances, Plaintiff will be unable to file it response in the normal course.
4. Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to file its response to the Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on a Motion to Dismiss to Tuesday, April 7, 2015.
5. No party will be prejudiced by the agreed-upon extension.
6. Therefore, good cause exists to extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to Stay on or before April 7, 2015.
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
