Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ANNIVERSARY MINING CLAIMS, L.L.C. v. U.S., 2:16-cv-00932-JCM-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160816a23 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 23), filed on August 12, 2016. The parties request a 180-day discovery period, which is to commence following the court's ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss. The parties are in effect requesting a stay of discovery pending Defendants' motion to dismiss. However, the parties have not set forth the requisite good cause to support a stay of dis
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 23), filed on August 12, 2016. The parties request a 180-day discovery period, which is to commence following the court's ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss. The parties are in effect requesting a stay of discovery pending Defendants' motion to dismiss. However, the parties have not set forth the requisite good cause to support a stay of discovery under the case law in this district. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 23) is denied. The parties may submit a revised proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that sets forth specific dates for discovery and all related deadlines. If the parties desire to stay discovery pending a decision on Defendants' motion to dismiss, they may file a motion to stay discovery supported by good cause.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer