Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. SCHUCK, 8:12CR107. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20120510b28 Visitors: 27
Filed: May 09, 2012
Latest Update: May 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the oral motion of the government and the defendants for an extension of the discovery and pretrial motion deadlines The motion was made during the arraignment on the Indictment on May 9, 2012. Each defendant agreed to the motion and acknowledged the additional time needed for their motion would be excluded under the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act. The oral motion was granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion
More

ORDER

THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the oral motion of the government and the defendants for an extension of the discovery and pretrial motion deadlines The motion was made during the arraignment on the Indictment on May 9, 2012. Each defendant agreed to the motion and acknowledged the additional time needed for their motion would be excluded under the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act. The oral motion was granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion for an extension of time for discovery and to file pretrial motions is granted. The parties shall have to on or before May 23, 2012, in which to complete discovery and shall have to on or before June 29, 2012, in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., from May 9, 2012, through June 29, 2012, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendants' counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer