Winnemucca Indian Colony v. U.S. ex rel. Department of the Interior, 3:11-cv-00622-RJC-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180307716
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2018
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Comes Now, the Ayer Group, by and through undersigned counsel, and moves this Court for an extension of time in which to oppose Plaintiffs' motion for hearing (ECF No. 279) and motion to enforce and acknowledge tribal court decisions (ECF No. 280). This motion is unopposed and agreed to by Plaintiffs' counsel, but due to initial communication difficulties a Stipulation was not able to be prepared and
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Comes Now, the Ayer Group, by and through undersigned counsel, and moves this Court for an extension of time in which to oppose Plaintiffs' motion for hearing (ECF No. 279) and motion to enforce and acknowledge tribal court decisions (ECF No. 280). This motion is unopposed and agreed to by Plaintiffs' counsel, but due to initial communication difficulties a Stipulation was not able to be prepared and r..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(First Request)
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Comes Now, the Ayer Group, by and through undersigned counsel, and moves this Court for an extension of time in which to oppose Plaintiffs' motion for hearing (ECF No. 279) and motion to enforce and acknowledge tribal court decisions (ECF No. 280). This motion is unopposed and agreed to by Plaintiffs' counsel, but due to initial communication difficulties a Stipulation was not able to be prepared and reviewed in time.
This is the Ayer Group's first request for an extension of time. An extension of thirty (30) days is requested up to and through February 12, 2018. This extension has been previously stipulated to between Plaintiff and Defendant United States of America, et al. for those said defendants to address the same motions. Thus the granting of this current extension will not create any prejudice or delay in this matter. This extension is being requested based on the undersigned having been out of town with other obligations and is in need of additional time to conduct legal research and fully brief this matter. The Ayer Group seeks this extension in good faith and not for the purpose of any delay. Based on the above, the Ayer Group respectfully requests to have up to and through February 12, 2018 to respond to ECF numbers 279 and 280.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
