LUXENBERG v. CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA EX. REL. CLARK COUNTY JUSTICE COURT, 2:16-cv-001762. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161130c51
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT (Dkt. #14) [FIRST REQUEST PURSUANT TO LR IA 6-1(a)] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , Magistrate Judge . Andrew L. Rempfer of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, counsel of record for Plaintiff STACY LUXENBERG ("Plaintiff") and Steven Wolfson and Scott Davis of CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, as counsel of record for Defendant CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The due date for Plai
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT (Dkt. #14) [FIRST REQUEST PURSUANT TO LR IA 6-1(a)] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , Magistrate Judge . Andrew L. Rempfer of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, counsel of record for Plaintiff STACY LUXENBERG ("Plaintiff") and Steven Wolfson and Scott Davis of CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, as counsel of record for Defendant CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The due date for Plain..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT (Dkt. #14)
[FIRST REQUEST PURSUANT TO LR IA 6-1(a)]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, Magistrate Judge.
Andrew L. Rempfer of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, counsel of record for Plaintiff STACY LUXENBERG ("Plaintiff") and Steven Wolfson and Scott Davis of CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, as counsel of record for Defendant CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The due date for Plaintiff's Responses to Motion to Summary Judgement (Dkt. #14) be extended from November 26, 2016 to January 25, 2017.
This is Plaintiff and Defendant's first request to extend this deadline, which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This extension is requested to allow Plaintiff to conduct discovery in order to respond to Defendant's Motion.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle