Filed: Aug. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO ITS MOTION TO BIFURCATE (DOCKET NO. 77) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter "BANA" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Rachel E. Donn, Esq. of HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON and Defendant/Counterclaimant SAMUEL R. BAILEY (hereinafter "Bailey" or "Defendant"), by and through his counsel of record, Frank M. Fl
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO ITS MOTION TO BIFURCATE (DOCKET NO. 77) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter "BANA" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Rachel E. Donn, Esq. of HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON and Defendant/Counterclaimant SAMUEL R. BAILEY (hereinafter "Bailey" or "Defendant"), by and through his counsel of record, Frank M. Fla..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO ITS MOTION TO BIFURCATE (DOCKET NO. 77)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter "BANA" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Rachel E. Donn, Esq. of HOLLEY DRIGGS WALCH FINE WRAY PUZEY & THOMPSON and Defendant/Counterclaimant SAMUEL R. BAILEY (hereinafter "Bailey" or "Defendant"), by and through his counsel of record, Frank M. Flansburg, III, Esq. of SCHWARTZ FLANSBURG PLLC, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file its Reply to the Opposition of Defendant to Plaintiff's Motion to Bifurcate ("Reply") for one week. The Plaintiff's Motion to Bifurcate Trial was filed on July 19, 2017 (Docket No. 77). This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension. Good cause exists for this extension and its purpose is not for delay.
Plaintiff's current deadline to file its Reply is August 14, 2017, and the Parties agree to a one-week extension until August 21, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to file its Reply to the Opposition to its Motion to Bifurcate is extended until August 21, 2017.
