Koopman v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., 2:15-cv-00462-MMD-CWH. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150715a87
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, CHRISTINE KOOPMAN ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. ("Defendant"), hereby submit the following Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The current deadline is set for July 13, 2015. 1. Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on March 12, 2015. [Dkt. No. 1] 2.
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, CHRISTINE KOOPMAN ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. ("Defendant"), hereby submit the following Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The current deadline is set for July 13, 2015. 1. Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on March 12, 2015. [Dkt. No. 1] 2. D..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
[SECOND REQUEST]
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff, CHRISTINE KOOPMAN ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. ("Defendant"), hereby submit the following Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The current deadline is set for July 13, 2015.
1. Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on March 12, 2015. [Dkt. No. 1]
2. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 9] on June 12, 2015.
3. The parties are engaged in good faith settlement discussion. Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to an extension of time of 30 days, up to and including August 12, 2015 for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion To Dismiss.
4. This request is not made for purposes of delay, but rather to allow the parties to explore settlement.
The parties therefore respectfully request this Court enter an order granting an extension of time of 30 days, up to and including August 12, 2015, for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Plaintiff shall have 30 days, up to and including August 12, 2015, to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.
Source: Leagle
