Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

De Loera v. Harvey's Tahoe Management Company, Inc., 3:17-cv-00575-LRH-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180222g34 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CROSS-CLAIM (First Request) AND ORDER THEREON LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Defendants/Cross-Defendants Adam Lawler and Christopher Chavarin, (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant/Cross-Claimant Harvey's Tahoe Management Company, Inc. ("Harvey's"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have up to and including Monday, March 19, 2018 to respond to
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CROSS-CLAIM

(First Request)

AND ORDER THEREON

Defendants/Cross-Defendants Adam Lawler and Christopher Chavarin, (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant/Cross-Claimant Harvey's Tahoe Management Company, Inc. ("Harvey's"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have up to and including Monday, March 19, 2018 to respond to Harvey's cross-claim in the above-captioned matter.

This Stipulation is made for good cause because a settlement conference has been set in this matter for Friday, March 9, 2018, and the parties wish to focus their attention on possible resolution. In addition, a brief extension will afford Defendants more time to evaluate Harvey's cross-claim and prepare their response if it is needed. This extension is not being sought for any improper purpose or delay.

This is the first request Defendants have made for an extension of time to respond to Harvey's cross-claim.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, nunc pro tunc.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer