Filed: Jun. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, Defendant SDH Services West LLC 1 ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Rodrigo Padilla ("Plaintiff") hereby request a two week extension of time, up to and including, July 8, 2019 for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). The present deadline for Defendant to file its respon
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, Defendant SDH Services West LLC 1 ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Rodrigo Padilla ("Plaintiff") hereby request a two week extension of time, up to and including, July 8, 2019 for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). The present deadline for Defendant to file its respons..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(Second Request)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, Defendant SDH Services West LLC1 ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Rodrigo Padilla ("Plaintiff") hereby request a two week extension of time, up to and including, July 8, 2019 for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). The present deadline for Defendant to file its response is June 24, 2019. This is the parties' second request for an extension of time for Defendant to file its response. This Stipulation is made in good faith and is not intended for purposes of delay.
The first request for an extension of time was made on June 3, 2019 so that the parties could explore whether and to what extent they were agreeable to stipulating to arbitrate this matter. (ECF No. 6.) If not, Defendant would then prepare a Motion to Compel Arbitration. (Id.) This request was granted on June 3, 2019. (ECF No. 8.)
Good cause now exists to extend the response deadline for a second time. The parties are further exploring whether and to what extent they are agreeable to stipulating to arbitrate this matter and/or whether early resolution is a possibility. If not, Defendant would like the additional time to prepare a response to the Complaint and/or file a Motion to Compel Arbitration.
Therefore, the parties respectfully request a two week extension of time up to and including July 8, 2019 for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint.
DATED: this 21st day of June, 2019 DATED this 21st day of June, 2019
HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
P.C.
/s/Marta D. Kurshumova /s/ Dana B. Salmonson
Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D. Anthony L. Martin
Nevada Bar No. 9017 Nevada Bar No. 8177
Marta D. Kurshumova Dana B. Salmonson
Nevada Bar No. 14728 Nevada Bar No. 11180
1785 E. Sahara, Suite 300 Wells Fargo Tower
Las Vegas, NV 89104 Suite 1500
Attorneys for Plaintiff 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
