Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WILLIAMS v. WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES, 2:17-cv-01655-RFB-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170703594 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FIRST REQUEST CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Riley L. Williams ("Plaintiff"), through his attorneys, Haines & Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services and Wells Fargo Financial Cards ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

FIRST REQUEST

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Riley L. Williams ("Plaintiff"), through his attorneys, Haines & Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services and Wells Fargo Financial Cards ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 14, 2017 [Docket No. 1]. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Wells Fargo requests, and Plaintiff agrees, that Wells Fargo shall have until July 28, 2017, to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so that the parties may discuss settlement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to on or before July 28, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer