USA v. Cunegin, 8:17CR184. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180122862
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [33]. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial. Defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a) at file [30]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [33] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for January 22, 2018, is continued to April 9, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds tha
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [33]. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial. Defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a) at file [30]. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [33] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for January 22, 2018, is continued to April 9, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [33]. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial. Defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a) at file [30]. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [33] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for January 22, 2018, is continued to April 9, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and April 9, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
