NUNES v. AFFINITYLIFESTYLES.COM, 2:16-cv-02265-APG-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20161121b13
Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 17) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 17. The date set forth in the proposed discovery plan regarding expert reports does not follow the format required by the Local Rules. See Docket No. 17 at 3; see also LR 26-1(b)(3). Additionally, the parties disagree as to the deadline for amending the pleadings and adding parties, but do not explain their positions. Se
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 17) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 17. The date set forth in the proposed discovery plan regarding expert reports does not follow the format required by the Local Rules. See Docket No. 17 at 3; see also LR 26-1(b)(3). Additionally, the parties disagree as to the deadline for amending the pleadings and adding parties, but do not explain their positions. See..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 17)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 17. The date set forth in the proposed discovery plan regarding expert reports does not follow the format required by the Local Rules. See Docket No. 17 at 3; see also LR 26-1(b)(3). Additionally, the parties disagree as to the deadline for amending the pleadings and adding parties, but do not explain their positions. See Docket No. 17 at 3; see also LR 26-1(a).
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (Docket No. 17). The parties shall file a new stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than November 21, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
