Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of New York Mellon v. Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master Association, 2:17-cv-01195-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181108l42 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee For The Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA16, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-OA16 ( BoNYM ), SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ( SFR ), and The Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master Association ( HOA ), by and through their respective counsel of record, her
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS

The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee For The Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA16, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-OA16 (BoNYM), SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR), and The Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master Association (HOA), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. SFR filed a motion to dismiss BoNYM's second amended complaint on October 10, 2018. ECF No. 80. The HOA filed a motion to dismiss BoNYM's second amended complaint on October 12, 2018. ECF No. 81. BoNYM's responses are currently due on November 2, 2018, per ECF No. 83.

2. The parties stipulate that BoNYM shall have an additional seven (7) days to file its responses to SFR and the HOA's motions. The new deadline for BoNYM to file its responses shall be November 9, 2018.

3. Additionally, the parties agree that SFR and the HOA shall have up to and including November 30, 2018 to file any replies. The replies would otherwise be due on November 14, 2018 per ECF No. 83.

This is the parties' second request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer