Gayler v. High Desert State Prison, 2:17-cv-02429-JAD-GWF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190805a69
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Defendant filed its Answer (ECF No. 27) on February 12, 2019. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling or
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Defendant filed its Answer (ECF No. 27) on February 12, 2019. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling ord..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Defendant filed its Answer (ECF No. 27) on February 12, 2019. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than August 16, 2019 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source: Leagle
