Filed: Aug. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE (1) DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs CREEL PRINTING & PUBLISHING CO., INC., SILVER STATE WEB, INC., S&S WEB, LLC and DIGITAL LIZARD, LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer LLP, and Defendant FUJI
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE (1) DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs CREEL PRINTING & PUBLISHING CO., INC., SILVER STATE WEB, INC., S&S WEB, LLC and DIGITAL LIZARD, LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer LLP, and Defendant FUJIF..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE (1) DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs CREEL PRINTING & PUBLISHING CO., INC., SILVER STATE WEB, INC., S&S WEB, LLC and DIGITAL LIZARD, LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer LLP, and Defendant FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA ("FNAC" or "Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, the law firm of Murchison & Cumming, LLP., that parties agree to extend Defendant's Response to and Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their Countermotion for Summary Judgment as outlined below:
The current deadlines and extension sought are set forth below:
Current Deadline Extension Sought
Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' August 14, 2015 September 28, 2015
Countermotion for Summary
Judgment
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their August 29, 2015 October 13, 2015
Countermotion for Summary
Judgment
These extensions are requested to allow 45 days for continued settlement talks between the parties prior to the courts ruling on the above motions.
ORDER
UPON STIPULATION of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that parties agree to extend Defendant's Response to and Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their Countermotion for Summary Judgment as outlined below:
The following cut-off dates are extended as follows:
Extension Sought
Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' September 28, 2015
Countermotion for Summary Judgment
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their October 13, 2015
Countermotion for Summary Judgment
IT IS SO ORDERED.
