Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hernandez, CR 19-32-M-DLC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20191218889 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . THIS matter comes before the Court on the United States' Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds: 1 The United States commenced this action pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853(a)(1) and (2). 2. A preliminary order of forfeiture was entered on October 7, 2019. (Doc. 26.) 3. All known interested parties were provided an opportunity to respond and publication has been effected as required by 21 U.S.C. 853
More

ORDER

THIS matter comes before the Court on the United States' Motion for Final Order of Forfeiture. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds:

1 The United States commenced this action pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1) and (2).

2. A preliminary order of forfeiture was entered on October 7, 2019. (Doc. 26.)

3. All known interested parties were provided an opportunity to respond and publication has been effected as required by 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1). (Doc. 28.)

4. It appears there is cause to issue a forfeiture order under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1) and (2).

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The motion for final order of forfeiture (Doc. 30) is GRANTED.

2. Judgment of forfeiture of the following property shall enter in favor of the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(1) and (2), free from the claims of any other party, the following property:

• $1,579.50 in U.S. Currency; and • One black LG cell phone with cracked screen (1B1).

3. The United States shall have full and legal title to the forfeited property and may dispose of it in accordance with law.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer