Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Aurora Canyon Homeowners Association, 2:15-cv-01308-MMD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181030c44 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO, 119, 120] (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff and counter-defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, cross-defendants Bank of America, N.A. and HSBC Bank USA, N.A, as Trustee for the Holders of Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Asset Backed Pass Through Securities 2005-HE7 (collectively, the Bank Parties ), defendant Aurora Canyon Homeowners Association ( Aurora ), and defen
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO, 119, 120]

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff and counter-defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, cross-defendants Bank of America, N.A. and HSBC Bank USA, N.A, as Trustee for the Holders of Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Asset Backed Pass Through Securities 2005-HE7 (collectively, the Bank Parties), defendant Aurora Canyon Homeowners Association (Aurora), and defendant, counter-claimant, and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR), stipulate to extend the deadline to file responses to the Bank Parties' and SFR's motions for summary judgment for seven days, or until November 1, 2018.

1. The Bank Parties and SFR filed motions for summary judgment on October 4, 2018. (ECF Nos. 119, 120.) The current deadline for oppositions to these motions is October 25, 2018.

2. Good cause exists to extend the parties' deadline to file a status report by seven days, from October 25, 2018 to November 1, 2018. The parties request this extension to allow additional time to fully address the issues raised by the Nevada supreme court's answer to the certified question and in light of the numerous cases counsel for all parties are involved in where the stays are being lifted in light of the answer to the certified question.

3. This is the parties' first request for an extension and is not intended for the purpose of delay or prejudicing any party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer