Filed: Aug. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING REGARDING REVOCATION OF PRETRIAL RELEASE (THIRD REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Certification: This stipulation is filed pursuant to General Order 2007-04. IT IS STIPULATED between the defendant ANTHONY NAVARRO through his attorney GABRIEL L. GRASSO, ESQ., and the United States of America, through ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney, that the hearing regarding revocation of supervised release currently scheduled for August 21, 2017,
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING REGARDING REVOCATION OF PRETRIAL RELEASE (THIRD REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Certification: This stipulation is filed pursuant to General Order 2007-04. IT IS STIPULATED between the defendant ANTHONY NAVARRO through his attorney GABRIEL L. GRASSO, ESQ., and the United States of America, through ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney, that the hearing regarding revocation of supervised release currently scheduled for August 21, 2017, a..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING REGARDING REVOCATION OF PRETRIAL RELEASE
(THIRD REQUEST)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Certification: This stipulation is filed pursuant to General Order 2007-04.
IT IS STIPULATED between the defendant ANTHONY NAVARRO through his attorney GABRIEL L. GRASSO, ESQ., and the United States of America, through ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney, that the hearing regarding revocation of supervised release currently scheduled for August 21, 2017, at the hour of 9:30 a.m., be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this court, but no event earlier than Thirty (30) days.
This Stipulation is entered into pursuant to General Order 2007-04 and based upon the following:
1. There have been two previous continuances granted to the defense in this case.
2. The defendant will need additional time to resolve his criminal matter in the State of New York which is the basis for the Government's revocation request and will therefore impact the Court's decision.
3. The parties agree to the continuance.
4. Denial of this request for continuance would deny the defendant sufficient time to be able to fairly resolve his case, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
5. Also, denial of this request or continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.
6. For the above stated reasons, the parties agree that a continuance of the hearing regarding revocation of pretrial release.
7. This is the third request for a continuance on the hearing regarding revocation of pretrial release.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon the submitted Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:
1. The defendant will need additional time to resolve his criminal matter in the State of New York which is the basis for the Government's revocation request and will therefore impact the Court's decision.
2. This stipulation complies with General Order 2007-04.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Denial of this request for continuance would deny the defendant sufficient time to be able to fairly resolve his case, taking into account the exercise of due diligence
2. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.
3. This is the third request for a continuance.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the revocation of supervised release currently scheduled for August 21, 2017, at the hour of 9:30 a.m., be vacated and continued to September 25, 2017, at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
