Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Trejo, 2:17-cv-01016-MMD-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190227f48
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This dispute involves a homeowner's association's foreclosure sale. ( See ECF No. 1 at 2.) The parties have reached a resolution except with respect to Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Martha C. Trejo, the borrower who defaulted on the loan with Plaintiff's predecessor. ( See ECF No. 41 at 2.) Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Trejo. ( Id. at 1.) The Court finds that default judgment is proper. Plaintiff has sati
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This dispute involves a homeowner's association's foreclosure sale. ( See ECF No. 1 at 2.) The parties have reached a resolution except with respect to Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Martha C. Trejo, the borrower who defaulted on the loan with Plaintiff's predecessor. ( See ECF No. 41 at 2.) Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Trejo. ( Id. at 1.) The Court finds that default judgment is proper. Plaintiff has satis..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
This dispute involves a homeowner's association's foreclosure sale. (See ECF No. 1 at 2.) The parties have reached a resolution except with respect to Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Martha C. Trejo, the borrower who defaulted on the loan with Plaintiff's predecessor. (See ECF No. 41 at 2.) Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Trejo. (Id. at 1.) The Court finds that default judgment is proper. Plaintiff has satisfied the procedural requirements for default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). The Clerk properly entered a default against Trejo pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) because Trejo has failed to appear after having been properly served. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiff has also satisfied the factors for obtaining default judgment articulated in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986).
It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (ECF No. 41) is granted. Plaintiff is directed to file a proposed order granting its motion within ten days.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion to file Exhibits B and K under seal (ECF No. 40) is granted.
Source: Leagle
