Filed: Aug. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request for this Pleading, Seventh Request for Entire Case Since Remand to District Court) HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 26-4, Plaintiff, AYODELE AKINOLA, and Defendants, DAVID SEVERNS and MIKE PREMO, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendants to file their Reply in support o
Summary: ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request for this Pleading, Seventh Request for Entire Case Since Remand to District Court) HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 26-4, Plaintiff, AYODELE AKINOLA, and Defendants, DAVID SEVERNS and MIKE PREMO, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendants to file their Reply in support of..
More
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request for this Pleading, Seventh Request for Entire Case Since Remand to District Court)
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 26-4, Plaintiff, AYODELE AKINOLA, and Defendants, DAVID SEVERNS and MIKE PREMO, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendants to file their Reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment by eight (8) days, up to and including Friday, September 7, 2018. The current deadline for Defendants Reply is August 30, 2018.
Good cause exists for the extension due to defense counsel's litigation and administrative hearings schedule. Defense counsel is currently working diligently on the Reply, but is in need of time to conduct additional legal research and finalize the Reply. This is the parties' first request to extend the deadline for Defendant's Reply and their seventh extension request for the entire case since the case was remanded to District Court. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
