Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Williams, 2:14-cr-00334-RFB-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170726f77 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT (Doc #109) (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Raquel Lazo, Esq., counsel for Defendant TONY WILLIAMS, that the deadline for Government's Response to Defendant's Moti
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT (Doc #109)

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney, and Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Raquel Lazo, Esq., counsel for Defendant TONY WILLIAMS, that the deadline for Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment, currently set for July 24, 2017, Doc. #109, be vacated and continued for fourteen (14) days, until August 7, 2017, or to a date to be set at the Court's convenience.

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons:

1. The government needs additional time to review Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment and file a response.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The defendant is currently in custody and agrees to the continuance.

4. For the reasons stated above, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the deadline.

5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

6. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(D) and 3161(h)(7) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(3)(A), when considering the facts under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(B), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i),and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

7. This is the first request for a continuance filed herein.

FINDING OF FACTS

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons:

1. The government needs additional time to review Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment and file a response.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The defendant is currently in custody and agrees to the continuance.

4. For the reasons stated above, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the deadline.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

6. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(D) and 3161(h)(7) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(3)(A), when considering the facts under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(B), 3161(h)(7)(B)(i),and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

7. This is the first request for a continuance filed herein.

ORDER

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment, currently scheduled for July 24, 2017, be vacated and continued to August 7, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer