Weinberger v. 911 Datamaster, Inc., CV 18-134-M-DWM. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20190806675
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY , District Judge . Plaintiff Lawrence Weinberger has failed to comply with Local Rule 56.1(b)'s requirement to file a Statement of Disputed Facts in opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Statement of Disputed Facts in compliance with Local Rule 56.1(b) on or before August 5, 2019. Failure to do so will be deemed an admission that the facts set forth in Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts (D
Summary: ORDER DONALD W. MOLLOY , District Judge . Plaintiff Lawrence Weinberger has failed to comply with Local Rule 56.1(b)'s requirement to file a Statement of Disputed Facts in opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Statement of Disputed Facts in compliance with Local Rule 56.1(b) on or before August 5, 2019. Failure to do so will be deemed an admission that the facts set forth in Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts (Do..
More
ORDER
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lawrence Weinberger has failed to comply with Local Rule 56.1(b)'s requirement to file a Statement of Disputed Facts in opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Statement of Disputed Facts in compliance with Local Rule 56.1(b) on or before August 5, 2019. Failure to do so will be deemed an admission that the facts set forth in Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. 25) are undisputed. L.R. 56.1(d).
Source: Leagle
