Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ERUCHALU v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 2:15-CV-01799-RFB. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151203e53 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2015
Summary: APPELLEES' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWERING BRIEF (First Request) Appealed From CASE NO. 2:14-BK-11381-ABL ADV. NO. 2:14-AP-01117-ABL (Related Appeals: 2:15-CV-00946-JCM and 2:15-CV-001266-RFB) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to FRCP 6(b) and LR 6-1, Appellees/Defendants U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., by and through their counsel of record HOLLAND & HART LLP, hereby move the C
More

APPELLEES' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWERING BRIEF

(First Request)

Appealed From CASE NO. 2:14-BK-11381-ABL ADV. NO. 2:14-AP-01117-ABL (Related Appeals: 2:15-CV-00946-JCM and 2:15-CV-001266-RFB)

Pursuant to FRCP 6(b) and LR 6-1, Appellees/Defendants U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., by and through their counsel of record HOLLAND & HART LLP, hereby move the Court for a three (3) week extension to file their Answering Brief through December 14, 2015. Appellant does not oppose an extension (see Exhibit 1).

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

The Court initially ordered the Appellant's Opening brief due on October 25, 2015, Appellee's Answering brief was due on November 11, 2015 and Appellant's Reply brief due by 11/28/15 [Dkt. #10]. The Appellant filed a request for a 14-day extension to file his Opening Brief on October 20, 2015 [Dkt. #11]. Appellees did not oppose the request. The Court granted Appellant's motion to extend time to file his answering brief on October 27, 2015 [Dkt. #12]. On November 9, 2015, Appellant filed his Opening Brief [Dkt. #13], and on November 9, 2015, Appellant filed an Addendum to Opening Brief [Dkt. #14]. The current deadline for the Appellees to file their Answering Brief is November 23, 2015.

Appellees' counsel has been consumed on matters in other cases including a multi-week arbitration hearing, expert deadlines, court hearings, and preparing several witnesses for depositions and also a damages evidentiary hearing. (Loosvelt Declaration). Appellees therefore request a three week extension for good cause through December 14, 2015 to file its Answering Brief and Supplemental Excerpts of the Record due to counsel's workload and the intervening Thanksgiving holiday.

This is Appellees' first request for an extension in this appeal and the request is made before the expiration of the deadline. A court may extend the deadline for good cause where the request is made before the deadline expires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A). Appellees' motion for extension is also unopposed, as Appellant has indicated he has no objection to an extension. (Exhibit 1: Email from Appellant). The declination of a party to oppose a motion constitutes consent to the granting of the motion. LR 7-2(d). Consequently, and for good cause, Appellees request this Court grant their Motion for Extension of Time.

DECLARATION OF RYAN LOOSVELT

I, RYAN LOOSVELT ESQ., hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney in the law firm Holland and Hart LLP, attorneys of record for Appellees/Defendants Appellees/Defendants U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (collectively as "Appellees"). I am over the age of eighteen years old, I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth in this Declaration, and could and would competently testify thereto in a court of law.

2. The current deadline for the Appellees to file their Answering Brief is November 23, 2015. I have been consumed on matters in other cases including a multi-week arbitration hearing, expert deadlines, court hearings, and preparing several witnesses for depositions and also a damages evidentiary hearing.

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of my November 22, 2015 email exchange with Appellant Godson Eruchalu wherein Appellant states he has no objection to an extension for Appellees.

I declare that the foregoing is true and correct under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

EXHIBIT 1

Ryan A. Loosvelt From: Godson Eruchalu <sirgodson@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2015 8:16 AM To: Ryan A. Loosvelt Subject: Re: Answering brief extension

Hello Mr Loosvelt:

I am in receipt of your request for extension of time to file your Appeal Answering Brief, I have no objection to your request" so you can proceed accordingly, with your motion to the Honorable court.

Sincerely,

Godson Eruchalu

On Sunday, November 22, 2015 7:58 AM, Ryan A. Loosvelt <RALoosvelt@.hollandhart.com> wrote:

Mr. Eruchalu, please let me know today whether you have an objection to an extension for US Bank to file its answering brief. As you know we have not opposed any of your requested extensions. Thank you,

Ryan Loosvet Holland & Hart LLP Sent from my iPhone
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer