Filed: Apr. 09, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 961 F.2d 372 AMERICAN MARINE INSURANCE GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEPTUNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1318, Docket 91-9306. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued April 7, 1992. Decided April 9, 1992. Appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Peter K. Leisure, Judge. Harry A. Gavalas, New York City (William M. Cassarini, Chalos, English & Brown, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas S. Howard, Hacke
Summary: 961 F.2d 372 AMERICAN MARINE INSURANCE GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEPTUNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1318, Docket 91-9306. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued April 7, 1992. Decided April 9, 1992. Appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Peter K. Leisure, Judge. Harry A. Gavalas, New York City (William M. Cassarini, Chalos, English & Brown, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas S. Howard, Hacken..
More
961 F.2d 372
AMERICAN MARINE INSURANCE GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NEPTUNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 1318, Docket 91-9306.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1992.
Decided April 9, 1992.
Appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Peter K. Leisure, Judge.
Harry A. Gavalas, New York City (William M. Cassarini, Chalos, English & Brown, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant.
Thomas S. Howard, Hackensack, N.J. (Holly B. Tashjian, Kirsch, Gartenberg & Howard, of counsel) for defendant-appellee.
Before: FEINBERG, WINTER, and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm for substantially the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order of the District Court in American Marine Insurance Group v. Neptunia Insurance Co., 775 F. Supp. 703 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
