U.S. v. SALAS-SILVA, 3:12-CR-00082-LRH-WGC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151221b41
Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statem
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy stateme..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at United States Sentencing Guideline ¶ 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in Title 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment of eighty-seven (87) months concurrent as to all counts is reduced to seventy (70) months concurrent as to all counts.
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated August 23, 2013, shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
