Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SOU v. BASH, 2:15-cv-00698-APG-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170412g51 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE AND REPLACE EXHIBITS [LR IC 6-1] CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: Plaintiffs Rama Sou, Tai Bui, and Scott Zimmerman (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and defendants Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash, Berkley Enterprises, Inc., Pepperdine Enterprises, Inc., Ninety-Five Fort Apache Complex, LLC, and Royal View, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), on the other hand, by and
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STRIKE AND REPLACE EXHIBITS

[LR IC 6-1]

TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Plaintiffs Rama Sou, Tai Bui, and Scott Zimmerman (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and defendants Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash, Berkley Enterprises, Inc., Pepperdine Enterprises, Inc., Ninety-Five Fort Apache Complex, LLC, and Royal View, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on March 20, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment against Jeremy Bash, and included certain exhibits with the Motion;

WHEREAS, on April 7, 2017, Defendants' counsel brought to Plaintiffs' counsel's attention that certain exhibits contained information that should have been redacted;

WHEREAS, in light of the aforesaid, and in the interests of equity and judicial economy, the parties agree to allow Plaintiffs to strike the non-compliant exhibits and to replace the exhibits with those that have been properly redacted;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that good cause exists and it is in the best interests of all parties that:

(1) ECF Docket 103-18 and 103-28 shall be sealed and replaced by the redacted exhibits attached hereto.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to seal ECF Nos. 103-18 and 103-26 and replace them with the redacted exhibits attached in ECF No. 107.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer