MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

DAVID NUFFER, District Judge.

The Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on March 11, 20141 recommends that this Court grant the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.2

The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Plaintiffs filed an objection3 and Defendant filed a response to that objection.4

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), de novo review of all materials, including the record that was before the magistrate judge and the reasoning set forth in the Report and Recommendation, has been completed. The analysis and conclusion of the magistrate judge are correct and the Report and Recommendation will be adopted. No hearing will be held concerning the objection.5

Although Plaintiffs voiced displeasure with the magistrate judge's conclusions, none of the arguments raised by Plaintiffs in their objection were supported by any citation to law, and Plaintiffs failed to explain how the arguments differed in any material respect from the arguments already addressed by the magistrate judge in the Report and Recommendation. Ultimately, Plaintiffs seek proof that Wells Fargo has authority to collect loan payments. But Plaintiffs fail to describe precisely what proof would satisfy this request. Moreover, Plaintiffs fail to assert that any other party besides Wells Fargo is claiming (or could) claim authority to collect loan payments. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation,6 and Plaintiffs' objection is OVERRULED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.7 is GRANTED and the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk shall close the case.