Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Menos ex rel. ECO Science Solutions, Inc. v. Taylor, 3:17-CV-00662-LRH-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180319396 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request) VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendants Jeffery L. Taylor, Don L. Taylor, L. John Lewis, S. Randall Oveson and Gannon Giguiere (collectively, "Defendants") and Nominal Defendant Eco Science Solutions, Inc. ("Nominal Defendant"
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(Second Request)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendants Jeffery L. Taylor, Don L. Taylor, L. John Lewis, S. Randall Oveson and Gannon Giguiere (collectively, "Defendants") and Nominal Defendant Eco Science Solutions, Inc. ("Nominal Defendant"), by and through their counsel, the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Plaintiff Hans Menos, by and through his counsel the law firms of Leverty & Associates Law Chtd. Ltd. and The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for the Defendants and the Nominal Defendant to respond to the Complaint in this action by thirty (30) days, through and including Wednesday, April 11, 2018, and request that the Court enter an order approving the same.

Counsel for Defendants and Nominal Defendants request additional time to analyze the full scope of the claims made by all plaintiffs in all jurisdictions, particularly in light of a fourth derivative action filed in a different jurisdiction since the first stipulated extension, and to prepare a response and defense that best promotes convenience, economy and consistency. Plaintiffs' counsel have agreed to the extension as a professional courtesy.

This is the second stipulation for an extension of time for any of the Defendants or the Nominal Defendant to respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer