FINAL JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG's Motion For Default Judgment And Permanent Injunction. The Court, having considered Plaintiff's motion, the accompanying memorandum of points and authorities, the Declaration Of Jonathan W. Fountain In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Default Judgment And Permanent Injunction, the exhibits attached thereto, the papers and pleadings on file in this case, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Default Judgment And Permanent Injunction is GRANTED.

1. Default Judgment

THE COURT FINDS that Defendant Wenzhou T&E Industrial Co., Ltd. ("Wenzhou") was regularly and personally served with the Summons and Amended Complaint in this action but has failed to appear and answer the Amended Complaint within the period prescribed by law, that the default of Wenzhou was duly entered by the Clerk of the Court on July 28, 2014, and that Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG ("SATA") is entitled to affirmative relief against Wenzhou. Based upon the foregoing findings, and good cause appearing therefore;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff SATA be awarded judgment against Defendant Wenzhou on Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, as follows:

2. Permanent Injunction

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that, Wenzhou, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, confederates, attorneys, and any persons acting in concert or participation with any of them including, without limitation, third parties providing services used in connection with Wenzhou's operations and websites owned or controlled by Wenzhou (including, without limitation, the website at <http://www.teautools.com>), including, Internet service providers ("ISPs"), domain name registries, domain name registrars, banks and other financial institutions, merchant account providers and payment processors (such as PayPal, Inc., Western Union), and any other payment processing service having knowledge of this Order by service or actual notice ("Restrained Parties") are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from:

a. Using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks in commerce including, without limitation: (i) by selling, offering for sale, distributing, promoting, or advertising any good or service in connection with such reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks; (ii) by displaying any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks on the website accessible through the <http://www.teautools.com> domain name or any other website owned or controlled by Wenzhou or that display Wenzhou's products (collectively, the "Enjoined Websites"); or (iii) by displaying any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the SATA Marks at any trade show in the United States, including but not limited to, at any future Automobile Aftermarket Products Expo ("AAPEX") trade show; and

b. Manufacturing, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the United States, portable electronic device cases embodying designs that are the same as or substantially similar to the designs claimed in U.S. design patents 459,432 S1 and 459,433 S1, including, without limitation, by: (i) offering to sell and selling such products to individuals or companies in the United States through the Enjoined Websites or otherwise; or (ii) offering to sell or selling such at any trade show in the United States, including, but not limited to, at any future AAPEX show; and

3. Refund of Security Deposit

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall forthwith refund to SATA the $15,000 SATA initially placed on deposit with the Clerk of the Court by mailing a check in the amount of $15,000 made payable to SATA's counsel, LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP, addressed to Jonathan W. Fountain, Esq., Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP, 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600, Las Vegas, Nevada 89169.