Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Octaform Inc. v. Warland, 2:19-cv-0006-JAD-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190328e38 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is non-party H-PAC Plastics, LLC's ("H-PAC") motion to quash a subpoena and for sanctions (ECF No. 1), filed on January 2, 2019. On February 25, 2019, the court granted the parties' stipulation to continue the briefing of the motion to quash. (Order (ECF No. 7).) The parties were to notify the court regarding the status of a resolution by February 28, 2019. ( Id. ) The parties failed to submit a status report. The court
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is non-party H-PAC Plastics, LLC's ("H-PAC") motion to quash a subpoena and for sanctions (ECF No. 1), filed on January 2, 2019. On February 25, 2019, the court granted the parties' stipulation to continue the briefing of the motion to quash. (Order (ECF No. 7).) The parties were to notify the court regarding the status of a resolution by February 28, 2019. (Id.) The parties failed to submit a status report. The court, again, ordered the parties to submit a status report by March 14, 2019. (Min. Order (ECF No. 8).) To date the parties have not submitted a status report, and Octaform Inc. has not responded to the motion to quash.

Under Local Rule 7-2(d), the "failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to granting of the motion." The court will therefore grant H-PAC's motion to quash and for sanctions. According to Rule 45(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees—on a party or attorney who fails to comply.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(1). The court will therefore award H-PAC reasonable attorney's fees for the preparation of this motion. H-PAC is encouraged to reach an agreement regarding the amount of fees with Octaform Inc. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, H-PAC shall file a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to Local Rule 54-14, by May 1, 2019.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that non-party H-PAC Plastics, LLC's motion to quash a subpoena and for sanctions (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that H-PAC is awarded attorney's fees for the preparation of the motion to quash.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the H-PAC must first meet and confer with Octaform on the issue of attorney's fees. H-PAC may file a motion for attorney's fees pursuant to Local Rule 54-14 if the parties cannot reach an agreement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that H-PAC's motion for attorney's fees must be filed with the court by May 1, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer