Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Espinal, 91-1682 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 91-1682 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 20, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 963 F.2d 1522 U.S. v. Espinal NO. 91-1682 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Apr 20, 1992 1 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED. 3 Federal Reporter. The Second Circuit provides by rule for 4 disposition by summary order when a decision is unanimous 5 and each judge believes that 'no jurisprudential purpose 6 would be served by a written opinion.' Decisions without 7 formal opinions 'shall not be cited or otherwise used in 8 unrelated cases.' Second Circuit Rules, ยง 0.23, 28 U.S.C.A.)

963 F.2d 1522

U.S.
v.
Espinal

NO. 91-1682

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Apr 20, 1992

1

Appeal From: S.D.N.Y.

2

AFFIRMED.

3

Federal Reporter. The Second Circuit provides by rule for

4

disposition by summary order when a decision is unanimous

5

and each judge believes that 'no jurisprudential purpose

6

would be served by a written opinion.' Decisions without

7

formal opinions 'shall not be cited or otherwise used in

8

unrelated cases.' Second Circuit Rules, § 0.23, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer