Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Dillard, 2:09-cr-00057-JAD-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191120d97 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2019
Summary: Order Granting Motion for Leave to File an Amended 2255 Motion and Directing Government Response [ECF Nos. 72, 81] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Willie Allen Dillard is serving a 15-year sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Earlier this year, Dillard filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 based on Johnson v. United States. 1 Dillard now moves to amend that motion to add claims under Rehaif v. United States. 2 The government responds that it defer
More

Order Granting Motion for Leave to File an Amended § 2255 Motion and Directing Government Response

[ECF Nos. 72, 81]

Willie Allen Dillard is serving a 15-year sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Earlier this year, Dillard filed a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on Johnson v. United States.1 Dillard now moves to amend that motion to add claims under Rehaif v. United States.2 The government responds that it defers to the court and asks that, if amendment is permitted and response is directed, it be given at least 30 days to file that response.3

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for leave to file first amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [ECF No. 81] is GRANTED, and the original motion [ECF No. 72] is DENIED as moot. Dillard must file his first amended motion in the format attached as Exhibit A [ECF No. 81-1] to his motion for leave by 5 p.m. on November 20, 2019.

And because a response from the government appears warranted, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the government must file a response to Dillard's first amended motion by December 23, 2019. Dillard will then have 21 days from service of the answer to file a reply.

FootNotes


1. Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015); ECF No. 72.
2. Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019).
3. ECF No. 83.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer