U.S. v. Saldana, 8:17CR310. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180226a90
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [21]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 90-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by May 22, 2018 and the current trial date will be canceled. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The trial scheduled for February 27, 2018 is canceled. 2. Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [21]
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [21]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 90-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by May 22, 2018 and the current trial date will be canceled. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The trial scheduled for February 27, 2018 is canceled. 2. Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [21] ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [21]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 90-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by May 22, 2018 and the current trial date will be canceled.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The trial scheduled for February 27, 2018 is canceled.
2. Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [21] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before May 22, 2018.
3. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 21, 2018 and May 22, 2018 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
