Filed: Jul. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF No. 309] (First Request CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through their attorneys of record of the law firms McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP, and FAIN ANDERSON VAN
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF No. 309] (First Request CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through their attorneys of record of the law firms McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP, and FAIN ANDERSON VAND..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER [ECF No. 309]
(First Request
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through their attorneys of record of the law firms McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP, and FAIN ANDERSON VANDERHOEF ROSENDAHL O'HALLORAN SPILLANE PLLC, and Defendants and Counterclaimant RUSSELL J. SHAH, M.D., DIPTI R. SHAH, M.D., RUSSELL J. SHAH, MD, LTD., DIPTI R. SHAH, MD, LTD., and RADAR MEDICAL GROUP, LLP dba UNIVERSITY URGENT CARE, by and through their attorneys of record of the law firm BAILEY KENNEDY, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On July 13, 2018, Defendants filed their Renewed Motion for Protective Order [ECF No. 309] (the "Motion");
2. Plaintiffs' Response to the Motion is presently due on July 27, 2018;
3. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, Plaintiffs shall now have until Friday, August 3, 2018 to file a Response to the Motion; and
4. This is the first Stipulation to extend the deadline for the Response to the Motion. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.