Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of New York Mellon v. Manchester at Huntington Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-02175-JAD-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190318b87 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLIES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 67] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc., Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-AB2 ( BoNYM ), Manchester at Huntington Homeowners Association ( HOA ), RMI Management LLC (RMI ) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ( SFR ) stipulate as follows: 1. SFR filed its motion for summ
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLIES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ECF No. 67]

Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc., Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-AB2 (BoNYM), Manchester at Huntington Homeowners Association (HOA), RMI Management LLC (RMI) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) stipulate as follows:

1. SFR filed its motion for summary judgment on February 11, 2019. [ECF No. 59]. HOA filed its motion for summary judgment on February 11, 2019. [ECF No. 60]. BoNYM filed its motion for summary judgment on February 11, 2019 [ECF No. 61] and RMI filed a joinder to the HOA's motion for summary judgment on February 27, 2019 [ECF 62].

2. BoNYM filed it response to SFR's motion on March 4, 2019 [ECF No. 63]. SFR filed it response to BoNYM's motion on March 4, 2019 [ECF No. 64]. BoNYM filed it response to HOA's motion on March 4, 2019 [ECF No. 65] and HOA filed its response to BoNYM's motion on March 4, 2019 [ECF No. 66]. All the replies are currently due on March 18, 2019.

3. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to file the replies by fourteen (14) additional days. The new deadline for The Parties to file replies in support of their motions for summary judgment shall be April 1, 2019.

4. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline and is not made for purposes of undue delay. The extension is requested so to allow all counsel an opportunity to meaningfully respond to the arguments raised in each respective opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer