STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 56(d) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Heather Ripandelli ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Clark County Collection Service, LLC, Borg Law Group, LLC, and Brooke M. Borg (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On January 30, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion For Summary Judgment (Dkt. 4) in the above-entitled action.

2. On February 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkts. 8, 9.

3. After providing additional materials to Plaintiff, Defendants offered to Plaintiff the opportunity to supplement her Opposition brief.

4. On March 3, 2017, while Plaintiff considered filing a supplemental brief, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulated (first request) to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d) to Monday, March 20, 2017. Dkt. 10.

5. Plaintiff has since filed a Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, on Thursday, March 16, 2017. Dkt. 14.

6. Defendants shall have until Monday, April 3, 2017 to file their Reply in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion Pursuant to Rule 56(d).

7. This is the second request for an extension of this deadline made by the parties.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.