United States v. Santos-Zepeda, 8:19-CR-51. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190705b46
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD , District Judge . The defendant, Jose Santos-Zepeda, has moved to continue the trial (filing 61). The motion to continue is unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the Court finds good cause has been shown and the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial (filing 61) is granted. 2. The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Ge
Summary: ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD , District Judge . The defendant, Jose Santos-Zepeda, has moved to continue the trial (filing 61). The motion to continue is unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the Court finds good cause has been shown and the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial (filing 61) is granted. 2. The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Ger..
More
ORDER
JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.
The defendant, Jose Santos-Zepeda, has moved to continue the trial (filing 61). The motion to continue is unopposed by counsel for the Government. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the Court finds good cause has been shown and the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial (filing 61) is granted.
2. The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in the Special Proceedings Courtroom of the United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on August 12, 2019, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and August 12, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
4. The defendant's motion for enlargement of time (filing 60) is denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
