Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cervantes, 2:11-CR-212 JCM (CWH). (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200127c23 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is Armando Cervantes's ("defendant") petition for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. (ECF No. 117). Also before the court is the United States of America's ("the government") motion to strike defendant's petition. (ECF No. 118). Defendant has not responded, and the time to do so has passed. Local Rule IA 11-6(a) provides as follows: A party who has appeared by attorney cannot while so represented appear or act in the
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is Armando Cervantes's ("defendant") petition for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. (ECF No. 117).

Also before the court is the United States of America's ("the government") motion to strike defendant's petition. (ECF No. 118). Defendant has not responded, and the time to do so has passed.

Local Rule IA 11-6(a) provides as follows:

A party who has appeared by attorney cannot while so represented appear or act in the case. This means that once an attorney makes an appearance on behalf of a party, that party may not personally file a document with the court; all filings must thereafter be made by the attorney.

LRD IA 11-6(a).

Defendant is currently represented by assistant federal public defender Andrew Wong. Thus, defendant is precluded from appearing or acting in this case pro se. Id.; see also United States v. Bergman, 813 F.2d 1027, 1030 (9th Cir. 1987) ("A criminal defendant does not have an absolute right to both self-representation and the assistance of counsel." (citing United States v. Halbert, 640 F.2d 1000, 1009 (9th Cir. 1981)). Any and all filings on defendant's behalf must be made by Mr. Wong. Id.

Because the instant petition was filed by defendant personally, rather than by Mr. Wong, it is a fugitive document. The court grants the government's motion to strike.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the government's motion to strike defendant's petition (ECF No. 118) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's petition for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum (ECF No. 117) be, and the same hereby is, STRICKEN.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer