U.S. v. COBB, 3:11-cr-00129-LRH-WGC (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151224a24
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER Defendant's Attorney: Nisha Brooks-Whittington LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 994(u), and having considered such m
Summary: ORDER Defendant's Attorney: Nisha Brooks-Whittington LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. 994(u), and having considered such mo..
More
ORDER
Defendant's Attorney: Nisha Brooks-Whittington
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at United States Sentencing Guideline ¶ 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in Title 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment of one hundred ten (110) months as to Count 1, with a consecutive 60-month term for Count 2, for a total sentence of one hundred seventy (170) months, is reduced to ninety-two (92) months as to Count 1, with a consecutive 60-month term for Count 2, for a total sentence of one hundred fifty two (152) months, and consecutively to case number 3:03-cr-00077-RCJ-RAM.
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated November 7, 2012, shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
