Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2015
Summary: Opinion and Order KATHARINE S. HAYDEN , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon motion by the defendants, Integrated Computer Sales & Service Inc. and Michael Cardella, to dismiss the complaint. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions, and notes as follows: • The complaint [D.E. 1] asserts claims against defendants for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended 29 U.S.C. 201, and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law. • Defendants move to dis
Summary: Opinion and Order KATHARINE S. HAYDEN , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon motion by the defendants, Integrated Computer Sales & Service Inc. and Michael Cardella, to dismiss the complaint. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions, and notes as follows: • The complaint [D.E. 1] asserts claims against defendants for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended 29 U.S.C. 201, and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law. • Defendants move to dism..
More
Opinion and Order
KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon motion by the defendants, Integrated Computer Sales & Service Inc. and Michael Cardella, to dismiss the complaint. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions, and notes as follows:
• The complaint [D.E. 1] asserts claims against defendants for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended 29 U.S.C. §201, and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law.
• Defendants move to dismiss the complaint [D.E. 5] on the grounds that (1) the controversy is controlled by a valid arbitration provision, and alternatively (2) that Lopez's claims are barred by the employment agreement that he entered into with defendant Integrated Computer Sales & Service Inc.
• Lopez, in his opposition to the motion to dismiss [D.E. 8], does not dispute the existence of an arbitration agreement and "requests that the Court deny the motion to dismiss, but enter an order staying this matter compelling arbitration."
Lopez, having consented to an order staying this matter pending the outcome of arbitration, and with good cause appearing,
IT is on this 29th day of June, 2015
ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss [D.E. 5] is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that, given plaintiff's request to stay this action, the Court will exercise its discretion and stay these proceedings until such time that the arbitration is complete. See e.g., 9 U.S.C. § 3; Lloyd v. Hovensa, 369 F.3d 263, 269 (3d Cir. 2004). For purposes of judicial economy, the Clerk's Office is hereby directed to administratively terminate this action pending the outcome of the arbitration. Plaintiff shall notify the Court upon completion of the arbitration if this matter should be restored to the active docket.
