Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DOE v. MAZO, 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170420d36 Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFFS' TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS NSEA AND CCEA'S MOTION TO DISMISS ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs, JOHN and JANE DOE I, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE I, and JOHN and JANE DOE II, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE II, and Defendants NEVADA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (NSEA) and CLARK COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (CCEA), by and through the parties' respective counsel, and
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFFS' TO FILE THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS NSEA AND CCEA'S MOTION TO DISMISS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs, JOHN and JANE DOE I, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE I, and JOHN and JANE DOE II, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE II, and Defendants NEVADA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (NSEA) and CLARK COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (CCEA), by and through the parties' respective counsel, and pending the Court's approval, the date for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint be extended from April 18, 2017 to April 25, 2017.

The purpose of requesting this extension is due to the recent Easter and Spring Break holidays and the complexities of the legal issues raised in Defendants' Motion.

In light of these issues, pending the Court's approval, counsel for Defendants NSEA and CCEA has graciously agreed to a one-week extension, through and until April 25, 2017, for Plaintiffs to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in this matter. This is the first extension requested in connection with the underlying motion and Plaintiffs do not anticipate requesting another extension. Plaintiffs understand the need to complete the briefing of this Motion. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully requests that this Court approve the foregoing stipulation.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer