Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. WALKER, 4:14CR3055. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20141021k83 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, District Judge. Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 30). As explained by defendant's counsel, the government cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 30), is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing wil
More

ORDER

CHERYL R. ZWART, District Judge.

Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 30). As explained by defendant's counsel, the government cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 30), is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on October 27, 2014 at 11:30 a.m.. The defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing. 3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer