Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Woods, 8:12CR44. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20190711b78 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON APPEARANCE FOR SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared before the Court on July 9, 2019 regarding the Petition for Offender Under Supervision [114]. Kelly Steenbock represented the defendant. John Higgins represented the government. The defendant was advised of the alleged violations of supervised release, right to retain or appointment of counsel, and any right to a preliminary hearing in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Proc
More

ORDER ON APPEARANCE FOR SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION

The defendant appeared before the Court on July 9, 2019 regarding the Petition for Offender Under Supervision [114]. Kelly Steenbock represented the defendant. John Higgins represented the government. The defendant was advised of the alleged violations of supervised release, right to retain or appointment of counsel, and any right to a preliminary hearing in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(3).

The defendant freely, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to a preliminary hearing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(1)(A). The Court finds probable cause as alleged in the petition to believe the defendant violated the terms of supervised release and the defendant should be held to answer for a final dispositional hearing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(1)(C). The defendant shall appear personally for a final dispositional hearing before U.S. District Judge Rossiter in Courtroom No. 4, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on September 4, 2019.

The government moved for detention based upon risk of flight and danger. The defendant is not in federal custody and requests a detention hearing upon coming into federal custody. The defendant shall be afforded the right to a detention hearing upon coming into federal custody and the government's motion for detention is held in abeyance.

The defendant shall be returned to the custody of Nebraska state authorities pending the final disposition of this matter. The U.S. Marshal for the District of Nebraska is directed to place a detainer with the correctional officer having custody of the defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer