Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HOULE v. MIRAGE CASINO-HOTEL LLC, 2:17-cv-00258-GMN-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170314b41 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO UNION'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER [FIRST REQUEST] GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Nicole Houle ("Ms. Houle") and Defendants The Mirage Casino-Hotel LLC ("The Mirage") and Bartenders Union Local 165 (the "Union"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that Plaintiff shall have up to, and including April 10, 2017, to file her response to the Union's Motio
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO UNION'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiff Nicole Houle ("Ms. Houle") and Defendants The Mirage Casino-Hotel LLC ("The Mirage") and Bartenders Union Local 165 (the "Union"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate that Plaintiff shall have up to, and including April 10, 2017, to file her response to the Union's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.

This request for extension made by the parties is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. More specifically, the parties are discussing the issues that prompted the Union to file the Motion to Dismiss. This request for an extension is limited to only those deadlines set forth herein.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer