Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SOTO v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2:16-cv-02063-JCM-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170117e07 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff and Defendant Clark County School District ("District"), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the District may have up to and including October 3, 2016, to respond to the complaint in this matter. The complaint was served September 2, 2016; therefore, the current response date is September 22, 2016. This is the first request for an e
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff and Defendant Clark County School District ("District"), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the District may have up to and including October 3, 2016, to respond to the complaint in this matter. The complaint was served September 2, 2016; therefore, the current response date is September 22, 2016. This is the first request for an extension to the response due date.

This request is being entered for good cause, in good faith, and not for reason of delay. Although District's counsel has been actively working on a response to the Complaint, she was called out of state to address the medical needs of an elderly parent.

THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the response due date be extended eleven (11) days up to and including October 3, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer