Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MONTOYA v. SMITH, 2:16-cv-00032-JAD-VCF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160502c73 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the deadline for the Plaintiffs to file an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Richard Smith, David Sazer, and Michael Twomey be extended by twenty (20) days. Presently, Plaintiffs' Opposition to said Motion to Dismiss is due on April 30, 2016. The parties stipulate to, and request, an extended
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND (First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the deadline for the Plaintiffs to file an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Richard Smith, David Sazer, and Michael Twomey be extended by twenty (20) days. Presently, Plaintiffs' Opposition to said Motion to Dismiss is due on April 30, 2016. The parties stipulate to, and request, an extended deadline of May 20, 2016. This extension is warranted because Plaintiffs' counsel has multiple dispositive motion briefs due and discovery deadlines in other cases in the month of April, 2016. As this extension would result in a deadline of May 30, 2016 for the reply of Smith, Sazer and Twomey, and as their undersigned counsel has other briefs due on or around that date, the parties further stipulate to extend such reply deadline to June 3, 2016.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer