Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. GONZALEZ-MEZA, 2:11-cr-00261-GMN-VCF. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20120309b41 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is defendant Monica Lopez' Motion To Suppress Evidence. (#25). The parties stipulated on December 14, 2011 (#27and #28), January 13, 2011 (#29 and #30), and February 7, 2012 (#34 and #35), to extend the time in which the government's response was due. In the most recent stipulation signed by the court, the parties stated that the extension is warranted because "[d]efendant signed a plea agreement and the matter is set for change of plea o
More

ORDER

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is defendant Monica Lopez' Motion To Suppress Evidence. (#25). The parties stipulated on December 14, 2011 (#27and #28), January 13, 2011 (#29 and #30), and February 7, 2012 (#34 and #35), to extend the time in which the government's response was due. In the most recent stipulation signed by the court, the parties stated that the extension is warranted because "[d]efendant signed a plea agreement and the matter is set for change of plea on March 1, 2012." (#35). The parties also stated that "[o]nce [d]efendant enters her plea of guilty, defense counsel intends to withdraw the Motion to Suppress." Id.

On March 1, 2012, defendant Lopez entered a plea of guilty to count one (#39) pursuant to a written plea agreement (#38). The court scheduled her sentencing for March 19, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. (#39).

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that defendant Monica Lopez' Motion To Suppress Evidence (#25) is DENIED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer