EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO REDACT PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT B TO MOTION TO STRIKE IN PART DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.'S ERRATA SHEET TO ITS 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION (ECF NO. 33)

(First Request)

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian") respectfully requests a four (4) day extension of time to file its response to Plaintiff John E. Ashcraft's Motion to Redact Plaintiff's Exhibit B to Motion to Strike in Part Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Errata Sheet to its 30(b)(6) Deposition filed on July 10, 2017 (the "Motion to Redact"). The response to the Motion to Redact is due today, July 24, 2017. Experian requests an extension until Friday, July 28, 2017, to respond. Upon filing its briefs in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike in Part Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Errata Sheet to its 30(b)(6) Deposition (ECF No. 31) and Plaintiff's Re-Urged Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30), Experian's counsel realized that she inadvertently miscalendared the response to Plaintiff's Motion to Redact. Experian supports Plaintiff's Motion to Redact and intends on filing a response brief substantiating the need for redaction of confidential information. With that response brief, Experian intends on submitting a declaration explaining why such information is confidential.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, a party may move for additional time to perform an act, and the court may for good cause extend the time to perform an act when the request is made before the original time has expired. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A).

Good cause exists to grant Experian's motion. Plaintiff filed his Motion to Redact on July 10, 2017. Experian's response was due on or before July 24, 2017. When filing Experian's briefs in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike in Part Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Errata Sheet to its 30(b)(6) Deposition (ECF No. 31) and Plaintiff's Re-Urged Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30), Experian's counsel realized that she inadvertently miscalendared the response to Plaintiff's Motion to Redact. Experian intends on filing a response to the Motion to Redact demonstrating why such confidential information should remain redacted.

Plaintiff will not be prejudiced as Plaintiff will still have seven (7) days to file a reply in support of his Motion to Redact. Further, Experian only requests a four-day extension to respond. Lastly, Experian has acted in good faith, immediately filing this motion upon realizing the error. Experian respectfully requests the Court grant Experian's motion and provide an extension until Friday, July 28, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.