Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KONDRK v. TOWBIN AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC., 2:15-cv-00330-RFB-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151221538 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Jeremy Kondrk ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Towbin Automotive Holdings, Inc., Towbin Management Inc., Towbin of Las Vegas, LLC, and Towbin Dodge, LLC (collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, have agreed to an extension of time for De
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Jeremy Kondrk ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Towbin Automotive Holdings, Inc., Towbin Management Inc., Towbin of Las Vegas, LLC, and Towbin Dodge, LLC (collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, have agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to file their Reply in Support of Their Emergency Motion for Protective Order ("Reply"). (Dkt. # 44.) Presently, Defendants' Reply is due on November 9, 2015. This is the parties' first request.

The parties are requesting the additional time to accommodate defense counsel's calendar in light of several depositions and other court filings in this and other matters. The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Defendants have up to and including November 16, 2015, to file the above-referenced Reply.

This stipulation in made in good faith and is not intended for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer